**Video Views**: 526161**Published On**: 2022-05-05 01:45:02**Video Published/Author**: PBS Space Time**Video Duration**: 00:17:32**Source**: Watch on YouTube

PBS Member Stations rely on viewers like you. To support your local station, go to:http://to.pbs.org/DonateSPACE

Sign Up on Patreon to get access to the Space Time Discord!

https://www.patreon.com/pbsspacetime

Space is big, and it’s getting bigger. But where does all that new space actually come from? And is it popping into existence all around you right now? Is that why the remote control is always further away than I thought?

Check out the Space Time Merch Store

https://www.pbsspacetime.com/shop

Sign up for the mailing list to get episode notifications and hear special announcements!

https://mailchi.mp/1a6eb8f2717d/spacetime

Hosted by Matt O’Dowd

Written by Matt O’Dowd

Post Production by Leonardo Scholzer, Yago Ballarini, Pedro Osinski, Adriano Leal & Stephanie Faria

GFX Visualizations: Ajay Manuel

Directed by Andrew Kornhaber

Associate Producer: Bahar Gholipour

Executive Producers: Eric Brown & Andrew Kornhaber

Executives in Charge (PBS): Adam Dylewski, Maribel Lopez

Director of Programming (PBS): Gabrielle Ewing

Spacetime is produced by Kornhaber Brown for PBS Digital Studios.

This program is produced by Kornhaber Brown, which is solely responsible for its content.

© 2022 PBS. All rights reserved.

End Credits Music by J.R.S. Schattenberg: https://www.youtube.com/user/MultiDroideka

Special Thanks to Our Patreon Supporters

Big Bang Supporters

Adam Hillier

Bryce Fort

Mark Evans

David Taiclet

Daniel Alexiuc

Peter Barrett

David Neumann

Charlie

Leo Koguan

Sandy Wu

Ahmad Jodeh

Alexander Tamas

Morgan Hough

Amy

Juan Benet

Vinnie Falco

Fabrice Eap

Mark Rosenthal

David Nicklas

Quasar Supporters

Alex Kern

Ethan Cohen

Stephen Wilcox

Christina Oegren

Mark Heising

Hank S

Hypernova Supporters

William Bryan

Gregory Forfa

Kirk Honour

drollere

Joe Moreira

Marc Armstrong

Scott Gorlick

Paul Stehr-Green

Adam Walters

Russell Pope

Ben Delo

Scott Gray

Антон Кочков

John R. Slavik

Mathew

Donal Botkin

John Pollock

Edmund Fokschaner

Joseph Salomone

chuck zegar

Jordan Young

Daniel Muzquiz

Gamma Ray Burst Supporters

Thomas Tarler

bsgbryan

Sean McCaul

Carsten Quinlan

Susan Albee

Frank Walker

Matt Q

WhizBangery

Avi Yashchin

MHL SHS

Kory Kirk

Terje Vold

Anatoliy Nagornyy

comboy

Brett Baker

Jonathan Conerly

Andre Stechert

Ross Bohner

Paul Wood

Kent Durham

jim bartosh

Nubble

Chris Navrides

Scott R Calkins

The Mad Mechanic

Ellis Hall

John H. Austin, Jr.

Diana S

Ben Campbell

Faraz Khan

Almog Cohen

Alex Edwards

Ádám Kettinger

MD3

Endre Pech

Daniel Jennings

Cameron Sampson

Pratik Mukherjee

Geoffrey Clarion

Nate

Darren Duncan

Russ Creech

Jeremy Reed

Eric Webster

David Johnston

Web Browser

Michael Barton

Christopher Barron

James Ramsey

Mr T

Andrew Mann

Isaac Suttell

Devon Rosenthal

Oliver Flanagan

Bleys Goodson

Robert Walter

Bruce B

Simon Oliphant

Mirik Gogri

Mark Delagasse

Mark Daniel Cohen

Brandon Lattin

Nickolas Andrew Freeman

Shane Calimlim

Tybie Fitzhugh

Robert Ilardi

Eric Kiebler

Craig Stonaha

Martin Skans

The Art of Sin

Graydon Goss

Frederic Simon

Tonyface

John Robinson

A G

David Neal

Kevin Lee

justahat

John Funai

Tristan

Bradley Jenkins

Kyle Hofer

Daniel Stříbrný

Luaan

Cody

Thomas Dougherty

King Zeckendorff

Nick Virtue

Scott Gossett

Dan Warren

Patrick Sutton

John Griffith

Daniel Lyons

DFaulk

Kevin Warne

what if dark energy and gravity is the same but if there is a certain amount of positive energy density in the vacuum then the dark energy is changing its properties from having a negative curvature (expansion and acceleration) to having a positive curvature (so called gravity)

this would mean the dark energy is all around us and is able recombining itself

When you say that the expansion only effects areas close to a gravitational field, how close? It almost sounds as though gravity must be a discrete 'on or off' for this to make sense, would love if you could explain further.

Based on this episode, there will be a tail-off of the gravitational "force" (i.e. Spacetime curvature) with distance from a "bound gravitational system". At some minimum quantity, there must be a transition phase, wherein the larger-scale expansion of spacetime expansion starts to come into play. It would seem that THIS is where we may find answers to the questions of Quantum/Gravity conundrums.

@10:00 Yeah, it can be traced back to "The Big Bang"…if you're married to that theory. I think "The Big Bang Theory" is cheating on you, and perhaps you should consider a divorce.

"This [exponential expansion rate of dark energy distribution] will never have any effect inside bound gravitational systems…" Over what time scale? It's certainly possible that all matter will eventually decay and therefore no gravitational systems will exist. Please see this channel's previous episode on Sir Roger Penrose's CCC model: https://youtu.be/PC2JOQ7z5L0

Since geodisics don't just pop out of nowhere, the universe is a countable set. This ties to holographic principle and the universe's information density as dark energy.

Pondering all of this is a waste of space and time. This is clearly a simulation, all of our senses are fooled, all of our instruments measure erroneous data outside of the local scope.

Is gravity as a counterforce to the expansion a valid way to explain the bubbly structure of the distribution of matter in the universe, i.e. the filaments being stable and the space between them expanding?

since more "space" is forming, does this means more "stuff" will fill in the new SPACE?

y'all gonna have to take advanced physics courses

Doesn anyone know: Is there a paper regarding this specifically? I am writing an article myself and this might be useful.

Or is it just a given, and supposing otherwise would be misinterpreting the equations?

Spatial Relativity. This expansion of space/time reminds me of Einstein's invoking the Lorentz factor to account for the discrepancies in Newtonian Mechanics at velocities near C, in his theory of Special Relativity. (Hence the pun), Rather than think of Dark Energy as a force, might it be possible to invoke a similar modification to space itself? Perhaps space is defined by mass/energy. In zones where m/e are dense, the dimensions are constrained (just as m/e is defined by one set of equations, whereas in deep space, in the FLRW metric, the nature of space is defined by an analogous factor to the a^2*t^2/c^2 component of Special Relativity. The latter describes velocity, but might there be an analog for relating space as a function of space and gravity?

So…..

New space is created, where it comes form nobody knows. The universe is expanding, but there is nothing it is expanding into. The expansion is not pulling apart local gravitationally bound areas apart, rather is it apart of the system itself because there is no additional field doing the pulling? Then somehting about infinite divisble plank length …

BrAiN.exE has stopped working.

Need a pop-up book written by Robert Munch or something….sheeesh

For the first time, I don’t feel convinced. Something is probably missing in the explanation.

[🙃]

I was afraid it would just be another Theory! We First need to know what Space is ? ✌️. DARK Matter? Again :. Like a Balloon expanding or, just more available Space ? OR ?

R ?

This rescaling talk makes me think of Conformal Cyclic Cosmology…. Is it possible for the space to only expand (or a better way of saying that is "become unreferenced" since, it should be able to shrink also) if each "quanta" of space is not entangled with the next? That begs the question: is it possible for light to travel through an area of "unentangled space" and it remain unentangled? I remember something like the entangled space from a online lecture of Leonard Susskind. Obviously I'm an armchair nobody, so… I am wrong, I'm aware of this. I'm at peace with it.

And then the James Webb telescope discovered no horizon just more of the same… billions more galaxies… and we all went to heaven in a little row boat.

Can it be that the new space is created when matter becomes energy ?

It will be interesting to see if James Webb Telescope will be able to measure just how fast those earlier galaxies are actually moving. If all of this discussion is true, we should be able to see they should be moving a lot slower than most things. We may not get to know this for a long time because Scientists need time to massage their theories.🙁

Is it possible that dark energy is “time” itself? Gravity slows time down does it not? But as the Universe expands over time, gravitational influences move the galaxies apart, thus accelerating time, and thus expanding the Universe?

Now to solve the question as to where dark matter is originating from. I have a theory that if a black hole was to achieve enough mass, it could break through spacetime and either punch into another reality or create a new one (The Big Bang), and as matter is (devoured) by the black hole it actually siphons matter into the new reality.

Now I am not a physicist in any way shape or form so asking me to show equations on this is far beyond our reality…..

We are WAAAAAAAAY too primitive and stupid of a species to be making statements like your video title. Anything "experts" come up with about how space works should be for entertainment purposes only. Maybe you can pretend to have a very basic understanding of our local space when we actually become a civilization capable of producing enough energy to leave our planets orbit and return home safely. And even then, we still would need to somehow develop faster than light travel so we could observe and be affected by the things we are right now only pretending to understand. Until then, this is all a big guess…it's fun but its all nonsense.

Felicidades, es un buen ejemplo.

250 sentadillas son unos 4.FO/L-J27g1 muchas y un buen ejercicio.

5:25 Se deja ver que hay muy buenos resultados 😍👍

Saludos desde la Cd.. de world 🌹😉💖

los mortales abian apreciado tan hermosa mujer.

Question & challenge: why have mathematicians & physicists not once used the inverse square law (the same the physical universe obeys) to precisely calculate pi?

Use of the inverse square law reconciles pi as 4/√x as it geometrically concerns x² – x = 1.000… & a mathematical proof of this is provided below.

Let a circle whose diameter is 2r = 1 be inscribed in a unit square of side length 2r & of squared area 4r².

Let both circle & square share a common origin o & let o be a point source of light emitting radially according to intensity I.

I = 1/D²

Let the intensity of a radial emission I be equal to the principle x in/of the (discrete unit) difference of squares x² – x = 1.000… and

let the distance travelled D be an indiscriminately distributed radial distance capturing a squared area (of a circle) πr² according to r.

x = 1/(πr²)²

and let r = 1/2 for being the radius of the circle inscribed in the unit square 4r²:

(πr²)² = 1/x

(πr²)² = x – 4r²

(π/4)² = 1/x

π/4 = 1/√x

π = 4/√x ≈ 3.1446055…

∴ π ≠ 3.14159…

π² = 16/x

16 = xπ²

E = MC²

1 = x(π/4)²

Unfortunately, the physicists do not have the capacity to even allow for the possibility

that the idol they worship (Einstein) did not know how to properly measure the circle.

The circumference of a circle whose radius is 1/2 = 0.5000… is NOT 3.145159…

…& this error underlies millennia of human ignorance. Watch the physicists do nothing.

I'm nobody but the speed of light isn't an actual constant and will slow down the further away cause of all the stuff it runs into along the way. Expansion theory only works it if the speed of light is a constant. In our math, we need the speed of light to be constant for the math to work. But, reality always surprises us. I also think the "Big Bang" was a local phenomenon, a very large supernova that we were eventually created by. It was probably a really big supernova and all that background radiation we "hear" is just it's stuffing still decaying.

This doesn't make sense. Light was shown to be constant from every frame of reference and it's obvious from red shifting that length is expanding, then plank lengths would expand, otherwise everything around us would get smaller and thus we would start measuring light speed at different constants.

Why is it assumed that all space is expanding? We observe galaxies traveling faster than light. Perhaps the space around the galaxies is warped from the mass of the entire galaxy. Because of this the galaxy is what is stretching space time from our observable point. Do we have ways to measure the stretching of space between an object that's not a galaxy? Not really because galaxies are the only things we can see that are that far away from what I understand. So what If all we are really measuring is the line of observation between us and a distant galaxy and that path between us is whats being stretched.

Is it possible to estimate our position within the entire Universe? ie: different observations in opposite directions showing different expansion rates.